AMA, AHA Call For Drug Pricing Transparency, Increased Competition
Published by Inside Health Policy
Representatives from the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association called for increased drug pricing transparency and reduced regulations to increase competition at a panel on Monday (Sept. 25) on the cost of drugs at America’s Health Insurance Plans’ Medicare conference.
AMA Senior Vice President for Advocacy Richard Deem said that not much will change when it comes to rising costs until the industry achieves transparency in drug pricing.
“Physicians should be subject to transparency in terms to prices in health care, as should hospitals, as should PBMs as should pharmaceutical companies. Because right now it’s really hard. You can’t make good policy unless you have good data,” Deem said.
AHA Senior Vice President for Public Policy Ashley Thompson added that in order for there to be more transparency in drug pricing, more disclosure requirements should be tied to drug pricing and research and development when companies apply for drug approval.
Thompson also called for more competition and innovation. She said that AHA supports fast-tracking generic applications when no generic competition exists, incentivizing generic manufacturers with fast-track rewards, deeming pay-for-delay tactics to be presumptively illegal and increasing oversight of such agreements, and limiting the orphan drug incentive to true orphan drugs.
Deem expressed concern about laws and regulations used to stifle competition, such as use of the patent process or risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. AMA has called for an end to patent evergreening and recommended policy requiring a modest change in the product in order to extend the patent. He also said that the AMA wants FDA to minimize barriers for new products.
“We’ve got to continue to work together in this process. Health costs are a problem for the entire sector,” Deem said. “I think that those of us, whether it’s health plans, hospitals, physicians, drug-device manufacturers, we need to step up to the plate and own our part in the cost increase.” — Ariel Cohen
Click here to see the original article on the Inside Health Policy website.
Recent Posts
-
House Lawmakers Push Bipartisan IRA Fix To Boost LTC Pharmacy Pay
A bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced legislation aimed at ensuring long-term care (LTC) pharmacies are paid an adequate supply fee to maintain patient access to prescription drugs for which prices are lowered through the Medicare drug price negotiation program, with the new maximum fair prices (MFPs) for the first group of selected drugs to take effect at the start of 2026.
-
Bill would fix drug-negotiation pricing flaw that undercuts LTC pharmacists’ viability
Lawmakers have proposed a supply fee to bolster long-term care pharmacies facing major revenue losses with the implementation of negotiated prices on 10 commonly prescribed medications Jan. 1.
The Preserving Patient Access to Long-Term Pharmacies Act establishes a $30 per Medicare Part D prescription in 2026 and 2027.
-
Rep. Van Duyne Introduces Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Seniors’ Access to Long-Term Care Pharmacies
Washington, D.C. – Representatives Beth Van Duyne (R-TX), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Buddy Carter (R-GA), Sharice Davids (D-KS), and Deborah Ross (D-NC) introduced H.R. 5031 Preserving Patient Access to Long-Term Care Pharmacies Act, bipartisan legislation to protect access to essential medications and pharmacy services for seniors and other long-term care (LTC) residents in nursing homes, assisted living, and similar […]
Stay in the Know
Get the latest news and updates on issues impacting the long-term pharmacy community.