Rosenbloom: Curb PBMs’ power
By Alan Rosenbloom
Letter to the Editor
The Washington Times
Despite the purported value of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), drug prices remain unaffordable for many Americans (“Prescription drug pricing reform must rein in pharmacy benefit managers,” Web, Oct. 18). As middlemen between the manufacturers, pharmacies and consumers, PBMs are notorious for abusive business practices that impact both patients’ wallets and their access to prescription drugs, while gouging unaffiliated pharmacies.
As Rep. Carter and Mr. Wilcox correctly note, PBMs process the vast majority of the nation’s prescription drugs. This undue concentration of market power means they can and do restrict consumer access to expensive drugs and cause delays in treatment, all so that affiliated pharmacies dispense and earn revenues while denying competing pharmacies access to high-margin drugs.
PBMs are not freestanding operations. They are part of huge health care conglomerates that dominate not only the PBM market, but a series of adjoining markets including health insurance, retail pharmacy, specialty pharmacy, mail-order pharmacy and long-term-care pharmacy. They have also become health care providers, which has allowed them to control the flow of medications. This anti-competitive behavior is clearly apparent in Express Scripts’ recent decision to reduce reimbursement rates for pharmacies in the TRICARE network, forcing veterans and their families to find alternate ways to access covered drugs — or simply pay for them out-of-pocket.
Small businesses, such as the community and long-term care pharmacies that are not part of these corporate behemoths, deserve protection from unfair trade practices. Consumers deserve more than the illusion of low costs at the price of easy access to essential medications.
To curb PBMs’ exploitative business practices, all stakeholders — including the Federal Trade Commission, Congress, the Biden administration and federal health departments — must focus on how these entities drive high drug prices, restrict access to essential medications and threaten unaffiliated pharmacies.
To view the original article click here.
Recent Posts
-
CMS Releases RFI on Part D Pharmacy Contracting Standards
Yesterday, CMS released a new Request for Information (RFI) seeking input on how it should establish “reasonable and relevant” pharmacy contracting standards in Medicare Part D, as required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (CAA). The new standards will apply beginning in plan year 2029. Importantly for long-term care (LTC) pharmacy, the RFI specifically asks […]
-
Pharmacy Group Wants CMS To Distinguish LTCs From Retailers Through RFI
Lauren Brensel // Inside Health Policy – September 16, 2026 A trade association representing long-term care pharmacies (LTCs) is hoping CMS will use an upcoming request for information to establish guidance on contracting issues like reimbursement rates and network adequacy standards that could differ for retail pharmacies. The group has met with CMS to discuss […]
-
SCPC Submits Pre-Comment Letter on Medicare Part D Pharmacy Contracting Standards
SCPC submitted a pre-comment letter to CMS outlining key long-term care (LTC) pharmacy considerations as the agency prepares its Request for Information on “reasonable and relevant” Medicare Part D pharmacy contracting standards. The letter highlights LTC-specific issues related to reimbursement, network access, contracting practices, audits, beneficiary protections, and other Part D contracting challenges. Read SCPC’s […]
Stay Connected
Get the latest news and updates on issues impacting the long-term care pharmacy community.